|
|
![]()
|
On Monday, Gordon dismissed allegations made by Holding, adding: "I regret that one whom I have long admired as one of our cricketing greats should have so readily descended to personal abuse and even defamation without regard to the facts."
But Holding told Cricinfo: "I have this to say. Ken Gordon asked me to be a part of one committee and one committee only. What was supposed to be a "cricket committee" which he refers to as an advisory committee. If this was rejected by the WICB, then when did he ask me to be a part of this "Win World Cup" committee?
Recommended Read
"I was never asked to be a part of any committee but a cricket committee - or as Gordon puts it an advisory committee - and when that was changed, both Clive Lloyd and myself declined to be a part of it. The WICB's own press release on August 22, 2005 states this as a fact. Now one of us is having difficulty differentiating fact from fiction and I will leave the public to decide which one it is.
"Whichever one it is, my resignation is a good thing. If I am the one having the problem, then the WICB should be glad to be rid of me as it shouldn't want anyone with such a serious problem on its committee. If Ken Gordon is the one with the problem, then I don't want to be on any committee of an organisation lead by someone with such a serious problem as you never know when it may crop up again So, both scenarios present positives for either myself or the WICB."


